In today’s digital age, the importance of fostering online communities has never been greater. Whether for a hobby, business, or support group, finding the right platform to host your community can make a difference. Among the myriad of choices available, Facebook Groups have consistently stood out as a strong contender. In this article, I’ll dive into why Facebook Groups might beat other platforms for building and growing your online community.
Table of Contents
Introduction
When it comes to online communities, it’s essential to choose a platform that offers both functionality and ease of use. With its enormous user base and integrated ecosystem, Facebook provides a compelling choice through its Groups feature. These groups can be tailored to suit any interest, making it easy for users to find and engage with like-minded individuals.
Facebook Groups are more than just a place to share posts and comments. They offer a variety of tools to facilitate meaningful interaction, like events, polls, and file sharing. With Facebook Live, group members can even host live sessions, bringing real-time engagement to the table. The sheer versatility of Facebook Groups makes it a persuasive option that caters to a wide array of needs.
Beyond the tools and features, Facebook Groups excel in one key area: accessibility. Almost everyone has a Facebook account, and the platform’s ubiquity ensures that members can easily join and participate without any additional sign-ups or learning curves. This ease of access can significantly boost member participation and retention, setting Facebook Groups apart from other platforms.
Why you’re told to move your community away from Facebook
Despite the many advantages of Facebook Groups, you’ll often hear advice suggesting that you move your community to a different platform. One common reason is data privacy concerns. Facebook has had its fair share of controversies surrounding data breaches and misuse, prompting many to seek safer community hosting alternatives.
Another factor is Facebook’s algorithm-driven nature. Posts within groups are subject to Facebook’s algorithms, sometimes resulting in members missing important updates. This lack of control over what gets seen and what doesn’t can frustrate community managers trying to ensure consistent engagement and information dissemination.
Then, there are data, analytics, and insights. Facebook Groups provide some data for you to work with, but it’s not nearly as flexible or detailed as alternative community platforms.
Lastly, there’s the issue of branding and ownership. On Facebook, you are essentially building your community on rented land. You don’t have full control over your group’s design, layout, or even how it appears in searches. These limitations can be a significant drawback for those who want a more personalized and branded experience.
An example of this is Facebook removing Rooms, their internal Google Meet or Zoom feature exclusive to Groups.
Alternative and dedicated community platforms
Given these concerns, many turn to dedicated community platforms like Discord, Slack, or even solutions like Circle, Skool, and Mighty Networks. These platforms offer greater control over data, branding, and user experience, making them attractive alternatives to Facebook Groups.
Discord, for instance, is popular among gamers but has expanded its reach into various niches. It provides robust voice, text, and video communication features within private servers that give admins control over their community environment. Slack, originally designed for workplace collaboration, has also become a versatile tool for community building, offering integrations with tons of external apps to enhance functionality.
Then there’s Mighty Networks and Cricle, platforms specifically designed for community building. They offer features like customizable member profiles, detailed analytics, and premium subscription options, making it an excellent choice for those looking to monetize their community. These platforms provide a more controlled and often more professional environment for community interaction, addressing many of the limitations of Facebook Groups.
Why I decided to stick with a Facebook Group
Despite these limitations and the attractiveness of alternative options, I ultimately decided to stick with a Facebook Group for the Imagen Community, and here’s why. First and foremost, the sheer number of photographers on Facebook ensures that the group has a large potential audience. This makes it easier for me to grow the community organically and reach people who might not be aware of other platforms.
Another reason is Facebook’s integrated ecosystem. From event organization to real-time chat via Messenger, having all these features under one roof simplifies management and enhances user engagement. The convenience of having everything in one place outweighs the limitations for many community leaders, including myself.
Sure, the event system has its flaws and sometimes doesn’t remind people of events they RSVP’d to, and the removed Rooms features make live conversations more complicated. But at the end of the day, photographers are there.
Lastly, Facebook’s user-friendly interface on desktop and mobile and familiarity are hard to beat. Almost everyone knows how to navigate Facebook, so new members have little to no learning curve. This ease of use encourages participation and helps maintain a vibrant, active community, ultimately the most important aspect.
The ultimate deciding factor
I was 99% sure I would move the Imagen Community off of Facebook until something extremely interesting happened multiple times.
I noticed a handful of businesses in the photography industry, including one of the largest photography tradeshows, attempt to move their communities to private platforms: Circle, Mighty Networks, and Heartbeat.
What happened did not surprise me, but it still blew my mind.
The groups, which had thousands of photographers, only had a couple hundred move to their dedicated community platforms, which also meant low reach and engagement at a high cost.
So those communities shut down, and all but 1 moved back to Facebook. The last moved to Instagram (which, by the way, does not have a community feature).
Conclusion
In conclusion, while Facebook Groups have limitations and face stiff competition from dedicated community platforms, their accessibility, integrated features, and massive user base make them a compelling choice for many community leaders.
The ability to tap into a vast network of users and leverage Facebook’s versatile tools often outweighs the downsides. Whether starting a new community or considering a platform switch, it’s crucial to carefully weigh the pros and cons to decide what’s best for your needs. At the end of the day, the goal is to create a vibrant, engaged community, and for many, Facebook Groups remain the best place to do just that.
Don’t shut out Facebook Groups solely because it’s not the best community platform.
Figure out where your audience is, and that is where you need to be—even with better software solutions available for your community.
Leave a Reply